Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Same Sex Marraige is Like Interracial marriage?

There is a wonderful article on Andrew Sullivan at ANDREW SULLIVAN: THINKING. OUT. LOUD.

This part struck me as to the current debate we are having:


Of all the debates Sullivan has been embroiled in, his collision with the gay left is the hardest to reconstruct, because the gay-rights debate has been transformed in the two decades since, not least by his own writing. Yet Sullivan wrote the first major article in America calling for gay people to be given the right to marry—and he was savaged by other gays. His talks were picketed by a group called the Lesbian Avengers, who waved signs with Sullivan’s head in the crosshairs of a gun.

In gay bars he was denounced as a “collaborator” and physically attacked. He was anathemised by mainstream gay-rights organisations, who refused to engage with him. Why? The Village Voice writer Richard Goldstein spoke for this tendency when he claimed that Sullivan was “promoting the bargain of assimilation. But this deal comes with a price. It requires gays to maintain the illusion that we’re just like straights… [But] we were interested in messing with the codes of sexuality.” By advocating marriage, Sullivan was opting into the very system gay people should destroy. He was just “Rush Limbaugh with monster pecs,” a self-hater who “would solve the faggot problem by urging gay men not to act like fags”.

Today, marriage is the Number One demand of the gay-rights movement. So why was Sullivan demonised for being the first to articulate it? He says now, haltingly: “It was the middle of a plague, we were all dying, and here’s this brash British guy who’s a Catholic and right-winger talking about something unfamiliar, that challenges their assumptions… [But] I was too narcissistic to realise that it wasn’t about me.”Sullivan was trying to alter the underlying argument of the gay-rights movement, from a radical assertion of difference to a radical assertion of sameness. The gay theme tune had to change from “I Am What I Am” to “I Am What You Are”—and for a dying generation, it was a message they could not bear to hear.In the middle of this conflagration, Sullivan wrote his masterpiece, a philosophical treatise called “
Virtually Normal: An Argument about Homosexuality”. The book rebutted both the homophobic right and the radical gay left to make the case for absorbing gay people into existing social institutions, especially marriage. He saw this as fundamentally conservative and Oakeshottian. His gay opponents were so enraged that they went—almost literally—below the belt.

So we are about to declare a right to a institution that has always been between and a male and female when just hardly not a couple of decades not only were a considerable amount of gay people were not intereted in this right they thought it was abhorrent to their gay or bisexual Id

Just something to think about before we start down this path.

Tip of the hat to Ann Althouse

2 comments:

mayur said...

Thank you so much for taking my comments on board....I am so glad I bought this app and so looking forward to the future updates


SEO Company

Unknown said...

My marriage has been completely transformed by the A New Beginning workshop by Dr Itua love spell. I am shocked that so much can be done in love spell by Dr itua and that a marriage can so quickly get on the road to recovery…The resources taught by this Dr Itua love spell really work and can help repair a failing marriage. I would strongly recommend Dr Itua love spell to any couple that is considering divorce. One step will change your life and marriage .
Here is Dr itua contact..drituaherbalcenter@gmail.com   whatsapp  ..   +2348149277967