Or fired. Better Yet fired and then taken back to the Levee and shot!! It is truly amazing this is the "conservative" voice at the NYT. How can people criticize FOX news when we see stuff like this .
Go to Pro-Ecclesia for his comments and link at Brooksback Mountain to the whole New Republic Article. Did McCain lose VA because Brooks liked the crease in Obama's pants?
... That first encounter is still vivid in Brooks’s mind. “I remember distinctly an image of--we were sitting on his couches, and I was looking at his pant leg and his perfectly creased pant,” Brooks says, “and I’m thinking, a) he’s going to be president and b) he’ll be a very good president.”
In the fall of 2006, two days after Obama’s The Audacity of Hope hit bookstores, Brooks published a glowing Times column. The headline was “Run, Barack, Run.” ...***“
I divide people into people who talk like us and who don’t talk like us,” he explains. “Of recent presidents, Clinton could sort of talk like us, but Obama is definitely–you could see him as a New Republic writer. He can do the jurisprudence, he can do the political philosophy, and he can do the politics. I think he’s more talented than anyone in my lifetime. I mean, he is pretty dazzling when he walks into a room. So, that’s why it’s important he doesn’t f*ck this up.”
***Brooks’s sympathetic columns help to validate the key myth of this White House: that it is fundamentally post-partisan. Plus, Brooks appeals to a major Obama constituency: the latte-sipping Baby Boomers who were the subject of his 2000 best-seller Bobos in Paradise. These were among Obama’s strongest supporters in the last election, but their loyalty could be tested by spiraling deficits, botched health care reform, or a flagging economy.As much as any columnist, Brooks speaks to these left-of-center suburbanites. After all, he is known for attracting liberal readers who normally can’t stand conservative pundits. “I get a lot of people who say, ‘I’m a liberal and you’re the only one I read,’” Brooks says. “Sometimes, it can be a little condescending. … But you take the readers where you can get them. I do wish more people walked up to me and said, ‘I’m a conservative and I love you.‘ But, mostly, they don’t read the Times.”
Update-
Please note more liberal readers "Taken to the Levee and be shot" is a expression down here. No one is condoning violence by that. SO please don't put me on the domestic terrorist blog list :)
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
David Brooks of the NYT Times Needs To Be taken to the Levee and Shot
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment