The New York Times tries to tackle the real issues legal and Constitutional issues behind the HHS Birth Control mandate in a very short Editorial I give it a D+ for a not very good first efforts.
This Law Prof seems to agree. See A Poor Editorial
The piece also fails to mention the precedent being set here as to what is and waht is not religious. I suspect the paper wishes to ignore that because causes some concern among some on the religious left.
No comments:
Post a Comment