The Catholic Obama Blog At The Washington Post is At It Again

Unbelievable. Two day in a row has the Catholic blogger been shilling for Obama. Today's piece is Obama and the "Infanticide" Lie

I shoud have quit reading when the first line was
"“Obama” and “infanticide” are being matched in the latest venom eruption on hate-monger sites"

So to oppose Obama and bring up this is not hate mongering? See how this works.

He then has this incredible spin

The legislation would have required the state to provide health care to children born alive after an abortion. Now, existing Illinois law already covered all children.

But the BAIPA was intended to create a special status for the survivors of abortion – mostly late-term abortion. The BAIPA clarified that these survivors were “children.” If that was all the law intended, I think it should have been passed and Obama’s self-identified faith should have led him to vote for it.But things are not always as they seem.

Although phrased in legalese, there were three additional and problematic provisions. First, the BAIPA would have immediately usurped the rights of the parents without any hearing or legal process.

Second, the act would have mandated taxpayer funds be used for the health care as long as the needy child was alive, administered by still another government bureaucracy.

Third, it gave a green light to trial lawyers to sue just about everybody on two legs. Catholic teaching always protects the rights of parents against big government. Moreover, I have enough of my Barry Goldwater vote left in me to be wary of lining the pockets of trial lawyers.

What in heavens name does he mean by hearing? A hearing to see if the parents want to kill a Child born alive by a botched abortion? Can you imagine anything more horrific? Is this the Catholic voice at the Washington Post? Is this the face of Obama Catholics?

What a hack.